How people get it: Sold over the counter. Some need a monthly subscription for their full features.
The basics
What it is
Wrist-worn monitors tend to use a motion sensor called triaxial accelerometry, which measures movement in three directions.
Source: CDC: Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines ↗
What people use it for
Wearable devices are thought to be useful for tracking daily step counts and promoting an active lifestyle.
Source: CDC: Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines ↗
What the research has found so far
- The same study found wrist-worn monitors counted more steps than hip-worn pedometers during daily activities.
- The study found total steps were significantly higher on wrist-worn monitors than on hip-worn pedometers.
- Past validation studies generally show wrist-worn monitors overestimate steps in everyday life by 10% to 35%.
- Past studies also show wrist-worn monitors undercount steps by 35% to 95% when the wrist does not move, such as when pushing a shopping cart.
- The study authors concluded the 10,000-step goal may not be accurate for all users of all activity monitors.
Source: CDC: Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines ↗
On fitness trackers and aging, PubMed lists 212 trials in people, 375 studies that watched people over time, 0 animal and lab studies. See the counts and searches
Capped at stage 2: the large trial this search finds measured activity with a wrist sensor inside an exercise study; it doesn't test smartwatches or fitness trackers themselves (PubMed 29197830).
A stage shows how far research has got, not whether it will work for you. How stages work
Questions to ask your doctor
- Would fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings be useful for me, and what should I do with the readings?
- Which type or model would you trust, and how do I use it so the readings are accurate?
- Could I bring it to an appointment to check it against your equipment?
- How often should I share the results with you, and which numbers should make me call?
This is general information gathered from the sources listed, not medical advice. Talk to your doctor before starting anything new.
Devices you can buy
Read from each maker's page. The research stage is for this kind of device, not proof that a particular model is accurate or right for you.
What experts say
No expert views collected yet. Each one we add names the person and links to where they said it.
What others are writing
Recent articles about Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings from health journalists, hospitals and universities. We link to them; we don't write or endorse them.
Do Fitness Trackers Really Work? ↗
“With so many fitness trackers on the market, it can be hard to know which one to buy or if any of them actually work.”
The article says few fitness trackers have been validated, with step count and heart rate the most accurate metrics.
A More Accurate Measure of Calories Burned ↗
“Though it might feel great to finish a workout and see “calories burned” pop up on your smartwatch, that number is often surprisingly inaccurate, with estimated error rates of 30-80%.”
A Harvard study describes a smartphone-based calorie monitor that it says outperforms smartwatches and fitness trackers, which often estimate calorie burn inaccurately.
Exploring usage and perceived effectiveness of fitness trackers and mobile health applications among university students in Saudi Arabia ↗
“The most popular FT type was wristbands (43.7%, n = 156), followed by smartwatches (35.9%, n = 128).”
A study of Saudi university students found wristbands and smartwatches were the most commonly used fitness trackers.
Recent research
New studies that mention Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings appear here after the morning update.
See all research on Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings →
Trials
None of the registered trials of Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings is one we have linked as aging-related yet.
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 619 registered trials that mention Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings, for any condition (the count in The science below). Here we show the ones about aging. See them all ↗
Find Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings trials near you →
The science
Counted from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov on Oct 30, 2026, using one search for Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings in relation to aging. Each link opens the exact search.
- Randomized trials in people
- 189 search ↗
- Large trials (multicenter or phase 3)
- 33 search ↗
- Phase 3 trials
- 3 search ↗
- Trials in people
- 212 search ↗
- Studies that watched people over time
- 375 search ↗
- Animal and lab studies
- 0 search ↗
- Registered trials
- 619 search ↗
PubMed search used
(smartwatch*[tiab] OR "fitness tracker*"[tiab] OR "activity tracker*"[tiab] OR "wearable activity"[tiab] OR "consumer wearable*"[tiab] OR "Fitness Trackers"[mh]) AND (aging[tiab] OR ageing[tiab] OR longevity[tiab] OR healthspan[tiab] OR "older adults"[tiab] OR "older people"[tiab] OR elderly[tiab] OR "Aged"[mh])
Counts are search results, so they include some records that only mention Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings. How we count
Cite or share this page
Longevity Progress. (n.d.). Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings: Research stage and evidence. Retrieved October 30, 2026, from https://longevityprogress.com/treatments/smartwatches-and-fitness-trackers
<iframe src="https://longevityprogress.com/embed/stage/smartwatches-and-fitness-trackers" title="Fitness trackers: watches, bands and rings: research stage on Longevity Progress" width="340" height="72" style="border:0" loading="lazy"></iframe>
The badge shows this treatment's current research stage and links back here. It updates by itself when the stage changes.
