Friday, October 30, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETFRI, OCT 30 · 6 AM ET editionNext edition in Next --:--:--

AI scores facial aging signs and estimates how old a face looks

A study · JMIR dermatology · Oct 28, 2026

What this means

An AI system graded signs of aging in women's faces and guessed how old they looked. It was checked only on its own image set, not on new groups of people.

Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the abstract. The original is below.

Tested inPeople
Who it was tested in
468 women aged 18 to 80 in Texas, with 253 people judging apparent age
Kind of research
A study

The science

Original title
AI-Based Grading of Facial Aging Signs and Prediction of Visible Age From Standardized Facial Images: Algorithm Development and Internal Evaluation Study.
Authors
Flament F, Bokaris PA, Li T et al.
Journal
JMIR dermatology
Published
Oct 28, 2026
Study type
Study · in humans

Abstract

Background

Facial appearance influences visible age (VA), defined here as the age perceived by others; this perception-based outcome differs from chronological age and biological age. Human evaluation of facial aging signs can be time-consuming and subject to interobserver variability. A standardized AI-based approach might offer a more reproducible assessment of visible facial aging in digital dermatology research. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-based process for automatically grading facial aging signs and predicting the VA of participants from standardized full-face images.

What they did

Evaluation of full-face photographs of 468 North American women aged 18 to 80 years recruited in Dallas and Phoenix, Texas. Fifteen trained experts, including dermatologists, graded 13 aging signs using Skin Aging Atlas scales. A separate, naïve group of 253 North Americans aged 20 to 60 years, recruited in New York City, estimated the VA of each participant. For each sign, facial areas were pulled out using facial landmarks and fed into ResNet-based regression models, which were trained to match the averaged expert scores. The automated facial sign grading models were tested on 90% of the image set, and the remaining 10% was used for evaluation. Results were assessed using the mean absolute error, the proportions of estimates within 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 grading units of the expert reference, and Spearman correlations between chronological age, human-assessed VA, and predicted visible age (PVA).

What they found

The mean absolute error was below 0.3 grading units for 11 of the 13 facial aging signs. The average proportion of automatic gradings within 1 grading unit of the expert reference was about 98% for participants of East Asian ancestry group, 96% for participants of African ancestry group, and 97% for participants of European ancestry group. Human-assessed VA correlated strongly with real age (r=0.94, 95% CI 0.928-0.950; P<.001), although participants were perceived as around 10 years older than their real age, on average. The AI-PVA also correlated strongly with the human-assessed VA (r=0.93, 95% CI 0.917-0.941; P<.001), with approximately 70% of estimates within 5 years. The AI-based system showed low grading errors across most facial aging signs and also a fairly strong relationship between the PVA and human-assessed VA under standardized image acquisition conditions. Consequently, the system could provide a reproducible digital outcome for facial aging research and future longitudinal monitoring. However, external validation across separate populations, in men, and across image acquisition devices is required before clinical and consumer-facing implementation. As the predicted visible age is derived from quantified clinical facial signs, it reflects measurable features of visible facial aging, while its relationship with biological age and overall health remains to be established through future studies integrating biological biomarkers.

The authors' abstract, grouped under plain headings from its own section labels.

Read it on PubMed ↗

Flament F, Bokaris PA, Li T et al. AI-Based Grading of Facial Aging Signs and Prediction of Visible Age From Standardized Facial Images: Algorithm Development and Internal Evaluation Study. JMIR dermatology. 2026. doi:10.2196/93236. PMID: 42950221. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42950221/

Report a problem