Friday, October 30, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETFRI, OCT 30 · 6 AM ET editionNext edition in Next --:--:--

Age-driven miR-29 trades youthful plasticity for epigenetic fidelity

Early results, not yet checked by other scientists · bioRxiv · Oct 23, 2026

What this means

Throughout life, somatic cells must preserve their identity while retaining the capacity to adapt. How this balance shifts with ageing and rejuvenation remains unclear.

A plain-English summary is on its way. Until then, this is the start of the authors' own summary.

Tested inNot stated
Who it was tested in
Not stated
Kind of research
Early results, not yet checked by other scientists

The science

Original title
Age-driven miR-29 trades youthful plasticity for epigenetic fidelity
Authors
Craparotta, I., Barbera, M. C., Cassanmagnago, G. A. et al.
Journal
bioRxiv (preprint, not yet peer reviewed)
Published
Oct 23, 2026
Study type
Preprint

Abstract

Throughout life, somatic cells must preserve their identity while retaining the capacity to adapt. How this balance shifts with ageing and rejuvenation remains unclear. Here we identify miR-29 as a central point of convergence between the transcriptional programmes of physiological ageing and two routes to rejuvenation: induced reprogramming and the natural reset of early development. miR-29 rises with ageing, falls in both rejuvenation settings and shows the most conserved age-associated increase across vertebrates. miR-29 inhibition opposes transcriptional ageing, whereas mimics promote an older transcriptional state. Methylome analysis reveals a broader function: inhibition releases the miR-29 brake on remodelling, and mimic treatment reinforces it. This release increases methylation at repeat-associated CpGs and lowers epigenetic-clock estimates through unequal contributions in opposite directions. Inhibition also amplifies stimulus-induced methylation changes but reduces fidelity to lineage-specific methylation patterns. We extend this relationship to cancer, where low miR-29 expression marks tumours with younger epigenetic-age estimates yet greater methylation divergence from their tissue of origin. These findings identify miR-29 as a control point linking ageing, rejuvenation and cancer, and support a maladaptive trade-off model in which epigenetic fidelity is preserved at the expense of the plasticity needed for methylome maintenance and adaptation.

Read it on bioRxiv ↗

Craparotta, I., Barbera, M. C., Cassanmagnago, G. A. et al. Age-driven miR-29 trades youthful plasticity for epigenetic fidelity. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.10.18.759616. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.18.759616

Report a problem